Archives of the BVDA's recent News postings:

 

Upcoming Legislative Meetings

 

Here is a list of NM State Legislative Committee meetings which may impact BVDA and are scheduled for July.  Occasionally the time or agenda of a scheduled meeting changes, so call the Legislative Council Service at (505)986-4600 if you plan to attend, in order to confirm the information.   In order to receive the newsletter, call the above number or e-mail wpxtra (at) nmlegis.gov  (replace the (at) with the @ sign).

Radioactive and Hazardous Materials (RHMC)

July:  TBD  (Watch for more information on this one.)

 

Water and Natural Resources (WNRC)

July 6 – 7:  TBD

Socorro

 

Economic and Rural Development (ERD)

July 8:  10:00 a.m., Deming

July 9: 9:00 a.m – 12:30 p.m, Deming

July 9: 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m., Elephant Butte

July 10:  9:00 a.m., Elephant Butte

Agenda Items:  agricultural issues, medial marijuana, wine industry, spaceport, White Sands, tourism

 

Indian Affairs (IAC)

July 12:  UNM Law School

July 14 – 15:  Pueblo of Santa Ana

Agenda Items:  law programs, new law school dean, voting rights

 

 


Interesting reading

 

Ernest J. Sternglass, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus of Radiological Physics
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project
4601 Fifth Avenue #824, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

February 7,2009

Dr. Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue
Washington, DC 20585

 

Dear Dr. Chu:

 

I am writing to you to make you aware of a little-known tragic mistake that was made by the medical community and physicists like myself during the early years of the Cold War that has been playing a major role in the enormous rise of the incidence chronic diseases such as cancer and diabetes, and thus the cost of healthcare in our nation. The mistake was to assume that the radiation exposure to the public due to the small amount of fallout from distant nuclear weapons tests or the operation of nuclear reactors would have no significant adverse effect on human health.

 

This assumption was based on our experience with a half-century of studies that showed no detectable increase in cancer rates for individuals given one or two diagnostic X-rays. What was not understood at the time was that the radioactive elements created in the fission of uranium did not just produce a small increase in the external dose as received from the natural background sources. Instead, the particles and gases produced in the fission process released into the environment would lead to vastly greater radiation damage than from diagnostic X-rays or the gamma rays in background sources because the radioactive fission products and uranium oxides were inhaled and ingested with the milk, the drinking water and the rest of the diet, concentrating in critical organs of the body.

 

Thus, the radioactive Iodine-131 seeks out the thyroid and damages the production of key growth hormones as well as thyroid cancer, Strontium-90 concentrates in bone where it irradiates the bone-marrow, causing leukemia in newly forming red blood cells as well as damage to crucial white cells of the immune system that fight cancer cells and bacteria. Cesium-137 collects in soft tissue organs such as the breast and the reproductive organs of males and females, leading to various types of cancer in the individuals and their children as well as in later generations.

 

The mistake was compounded by the fact that in the early 1950’s when bomb tests began on a large scale in Nevada, it was not known that the adverse effect of radiation is tens to hundreds of times more serious for the developing infant in the mother’s womb and young children than for the adults studied following medical X-ray exposures. Nor was it discovered until the early 1970’s that protracted radiation exposures as from long-lived fission products accumulating in the body, is much greater than from the same total dose received in a short X-ray exposure.

 

As a result of this lack of knowledge at the time, government officials were able to reassure a concerned public that the small levels of nuclear fallout from the Nevada tests would produce no adverse effects, and point out the potential benefits of the peaceful atom. Thus, in the mid-1950’s, President Eisenhower was able to declare that dirty coal power plants could be replaced by “ clean nuclear energy too cheap to meter.”

 

Thus, a program of building a large number of nuclear plants was begun which were permitted to discharge small amounts of fission products comparable with the levels of fallout from atmospheric weapons testing.  This was also the time the Cold War had begun and thousands of nuclear weapons were produced and tested as a necessary deterrent to keep the large armies of the Soviet Union from overrunning all of Europe. Therefore, when it was discovered in the 1960’s that small amounts of fission products produced much greater damage than had been expected, and not only leukemia and other forms of cancer but also premature births, low birth-weight and infant mortality, it was kept secret by our government for fear that it would endanger the deterrent value of the nuclear arsenal.

 

Moreover, when a rise in healthcare costs began with the start of large-scale atmospheric weapons testing that increased sharply with the construction of some one hundred nuclear plants beginning in the 1950’s, this was blamed on the inefficiency of the system and the greed of the drug companies, and not on the large rise of releases from the nuclear plants built near the large cities, contaminating the milk produced in the nearby dairies.

The details of this story can be found in my book “Secret Fallout” that can be downloaded free from the Radiation and Public Health web-site www.radiation.org as well as a list of some two dozen papers published in scientific journals and five books published by members of RPHP.

 

Fortunately, the recent rapid development of alternative energy makes it possible to see an end to this tragedy, since it is possible to convert the aging nuclear plants to operate with natural gas. This can be done at a small fraction of the cost of new power stations until the alternative solar, wind, geothermal and hydro sources can take their place, as demonstrated by the case of the Fort St. Vrain nuclear plant near Denver, Colorado, now using natural gas.

 

If our nation that built the first reactors and nuclear weapons were to announce the goal of phasing out nuclear fission reactors that also produce the plutonium and tritium needed for nuclear weapons while developing nuclear fusion power and other non-polluting sources of energy, it will also make it easier to achieve the stated goal of President Obama of a world free from nuclear weapons.

 

Thus it is possible to look forward to a world free from the danger of the annihilation of human life by nuclear weapons using enriched uranium or plutonium that is only produced in nuclear fission reactors, together with the highly toxic nuclear wastes that remain deadly for thousands of years.

Sincerely yours,
Ernest J. Sternglass, Ph.D.

____________________________________________________________________

 

New at BVDA:  

A history of MASE and a re-cap of the 2008 and 2009 New Mexico Legislative sessions, by Chris Shuey, review it here

 

 

____________________________________________________________________

 

Post 71 miners have a new action alert page on their site.

 

April 2, 2009

Read what they are saying about US Senator Udall and NM Senator Ulibarri working against their constituents by clicking here 

 

____________________________________________________________________

 

 New Mexico Environment Department Prevails in Precedent-Setting Case
 Affirming State's Authority to Protect All Groundwater in New Mexico

 

New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission Rules Unanimously that
Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Must Clean Up Pollution

 

January 13, 2009, Santa Fe, NM.

From: Marissa Stone, NMED Communications Director
 
 For Immediate Release                                     (505) 827-0314
 or (505) 231-0475
 
 The New Mexico Environment Department prevailed today
 in a major case before the Water Quality Control Commission that
 reaffirms the state's ability to enforce the Water Quality Act to
 protect the state's precious groundwater resources.
 
 The ruling establishes that groundwater beneath Freeport McMoRan Copper
 and Gold's Tyrone Mine in Grant County is protected. The decision will
 require the company to continue to take steps to protect groundwater and
 clean up pollution beneath the mine property. The case reaffirms the
 state's authority to protect groundwater at any site it regulates,
 including mines, dairies and national laboratories.
 
 "The commission upheld the department's longstanding position that in an
 arid state like New Mexico - where we derive 90 percent of our drinking
 water from groundwater - all aquifers must be protected," said New
 Mexico Environment Department Secretary Ron Curry. "The commission
 re-established the state's right to protect water quality and all
 groundwater now and for future generations. This precedent setting
 decision is important not only for the Tyrone mine site but for the
 regulation of groundwater quality in Grant County and the rest of the
 state as well."
 
 The decision will require Freeport, formerly Phelps Dodge Mining Corp.,
 to continue to follow requirements the department established to protect
 groundwater at the mine site.
 
 The case hinged on Freeport's argument that groundwater within the
 Tyrone mine site - consisting of several thousand acres -- was exempt
 from state groundwater protections as long as the company did not cause
 groundwater off site to become contaminated. The result of this argument
 would have been to create a groundwater "sacrifice zone" at the mine
 site. The department has long maintained that groundwater underneath the
 site should be protected now and into the future.
 
 The commission rejected Freeport's contention that this groundwater is
 not protected.
 
 The case began in 2002 and has been ongoing ever since. The company,
 after a lengthy hearing, challenged the New Mexico Environment
 Department's hearing officer's initial decision in the case. The hearing
 officer affirmed the state's right to issue a permit with conditions for
 the protection of groundwater quality and require the company to follow
 provisions of the Water Quality Act. The case was subsequently heard
 before the commission, which upheld the department's authority. Freeport
 then appealed the case to the state Court of Appeals, which largely
 affirmed the commission's decision but remanded the case to the
 commission on the limited issue of groundwater protection. Today's
 decision was the result of that remand.
 
 I commend the commission on its hard work, technical expertise and
 thorough review and deliberation that required hundreds of hours of
 work," Secretary Curry said.
 
 The New Mexico Legislature in 1967 passed the Water Quality Act, which
 provides protection for all groundwater in the state.
 
 For more information, call Marissa Stone at (505) 827-0314.

 

_____________________________________________________________

 

New Mexico Environment Department reaches agreement with 
Homestake regarding water supply


HMC to provide city water to a dozen or more homes in Bluewater Valley

 

January 12, 2009, Santa Fe, NM.

In a signed Memorandum Of Agreement (MOA) between the NMED and HMC, certain
residents will be connected to the Milan water supply.  Additional information is available
by downloading the following documents.

 

 

Download the NMED MOA by clicking here - PDF File

Download the response to the MOA by the bvda by clicking here - DOC file

 

 

 

bvda Milan, Cibola County, New Mexico

Copyright © 2009 Bluewater Valley Downstream Alliance, bvdownstreamalliance.org.  All Rights Reserved