|
Archives of
the BVDA's recent News postings:
Upcoming Legislative
Meetings
Here
is a list of NM State Legislative Committee meetings which may impact BVDA and
are scheduled for July. Occasionally
the time or agenda of a scheduled meeting changes, so call the Legislative
Council Service at (505)986-4600 if you plan to attend, in order to confirm the
information. In order to
receive the newsletter, call the above number or e-mail wpxtra (at) nmlegis.gov
(replace the (at) with the @ sign).
Radioactive
and Hazardous Materials (RHMC)
July:
TBD (Watch for more
information on this one.)
Water and Natural Resources (WNRC)
July
6 – 7: TBD
Socorro
Economic
and Rural Development (ERD)
July
8: 10:00 a.m., Deming
July
9: 9:00 a.m – 12:30 p.m, Deming
July
9: 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m., Elephant Butte
July
10: 9:00 a.m., Elephant Butte
Agenda
Items: agricultural issues, medial
marijuana, wine industry, spaceport, White Sands, tourism
Indian
Affairs (IAC)
July
12: UNM Law School
July
14 – 15: Pueblo of Santa Ana
Agenda
Items: law programs, new law school
dean, voting rights
Interesting reading
Ernest
J. Sternglass, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus of Radiological Physics
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project
4601 Fifth Avenue #824, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
February
7,2009
Dr.
Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue
Washington, DC 20585
Dear
Dr. Chu:
I am writing
to you to make you aware of a little-known tragic mistake that was made by the
medical community and physicists like myself during the early years of the
Cold War that has been playing a major role in the enormous rise of the
incidence chronic diseases such as cancer and diabetes, and thus the cost of
healthcare in our nation. The mistake was to assume that the radiation
exposure to the public due to the small amount of fallout from distant nuclear
weapons tests or the operation of nuclear reactors would have no significant
adverse effect on human health.
This
assumption was based on our experience with a half-century of studies that
showed no detectable increase in cancer rates for individuals given one or two
diagnostic X-rays. What was not understood at the time was that the
radioactive elements created in the fission of uranium did not just produce a
small increase in the external dose as received from the natural background
sources. Instead, the particles and gases produced in the fission process
released into the environment would lead to vastly greater radiation damage
than from diagnostic X-rays or the gamma rays in background sources because
the radioactive fission products and uranium oxides were inhaled and ingested
with the milk, the drinking water and the rest of the diet, concentrating in
critical organs of the body.
Thus, the
radioactive Iodine-131 seeks out the thyroid and damages the production of key
growth hormones as well as thyroid cancer, Strontium-90 concentrates in bone
where it irradiates the bone-marrow, causing leukemia in newly forming red
blood cells as well as damage to crucial white cells of the immune system that
fight cancer cells and bacteria. Cesium-137 collects in soft tissue organs
such as the breast and the reproductive organs of males and females, leading
to various types of cancer in the individuals and their children as well as in
later generations.
The mistake
was compounded by the fact that in the early 1950’s when bomb tests began on
a large scale in Nevada, it was not known that the adverse effect of radiation
is tens to hundreds of times more serious for the developing infant in the
mother’s womb and young children than for the adults studied following
medical X-ray exposures. Nor was it discovered until the early 1970’s that
protracted radiation exposures as from long-lived fission products
accumulating in the body, is much greater than from the same total dose
received in a short X-ray exposure.
As a result of
this lack of knowledge at the time, government officials were able to reassure
a concerned public that the small levels of nuclear fallout from the Nevada
tests would produce no adverse effects, and point out the potential benefits
of the peaceful atom. Thus, in the mid-1950’s, President Eisenhower was able
to declare that dirty coal power plants could be replaced by “ clean nuclear
energy too cheap to meter.”
Thus, a
program of building a large number of nuclear plants was begun which were
permitted to discharge small amounts of fission products comparable with the
levels of fallout from atmospheric weapons testing. This was also the
time the Cold War had begun and thousands of nuclear weapons were produced and
tested as a necessary deterrent to keep the large armies of the Soviet Union
from overrunning all of Europe. Therefore, when it was discovered in the
1960’s that small amounts of fission products produced much greater damage
than had been expected, and not only leukemia and other forms of cancer but
also premature births, low birth-weight and infant mortality, it was kept
secret by our government for fear that it would endanger the deterrent value
of the nuclear arsenal.
Moreover, when
a rise in healthcare costs began with the start of large-scale atmospheric
weapons testing that increased sharply with the construction of some one
hundred nuclear plants beginning in the 1950’s, this was blamed on the
inefficiency of the system and the greed of the drug companies, and not on the
large rise of releases from the nuclear plants built near the large cities,
contaminating the milk produced in the nearby dairies.
The details of
this story can be found in my book “Secret Fallout” that can be downloaded
free from the Radiation and Public Health web-site www.radiation.org
as well as a list of some two dozen papers published in scientific journals
and five books published by members of RPHP.
Fortunately,
the recent rapid development of alternative energy makes it possible to see an
end to this tragedy, since it is possible to convert the aging nuclear plants
to operate with natural gas. This can be done at a small fraction of the cost
of new power stations until the alternative solar, wind, geothermal and hydro
sources can take their place, as demonstrated by the case of the Fort St.
Vrain nuclear plant near Denver, Colorado, now using natural gas.
If our nation
that built the first reactors and nuclear weapons were to announce the goal of
phasing out nuclear fission reactors that also produce the plutonium and
tritium needed for nuclear weapons while developing nuclear fusion power and
other non-polluting sources of energy, it will also make it easier to achieve
the stated goal of President Obama of a world free from nuclear weapons.
Thus it is
possible to look forward to a world free from the danger of the annihilation
of human life by nuclear weapons using enriched uranium or plutonium that is
only produced in nuclear fission reactors, together with the highly toxic
nuclear wastes that remain deadly for thousands of years.
Sincerely
yours,
Ernest J. Sternglass, Ph.D.
____________________________________________________________________
New at BVDA:
A history of MASE and a
re-cap of the 2008 and 2009 New Mexico Legislative sessions, by Chris Shuey,
review it here
____________________________________________________________________
Post 71 miners have a new
action alert page on their site.
April 2, 2009
Read what they are
saying about US Senator Udall and NM Senator Ulibarri working against their
constituents by clicking here
____________________________________________________________________
New
Mexico Environment Department Prevails in Precedent-Setting Case
Affirming
State's Authority to Protect All Groundwater in New Mexico
New
Mexico Water Quality Control Commission Rules Unanimously that
Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Must Clean Up Pollution
January 13,
2009, Santa Fe, NM.
From: Marissa
Stone, NMED Communications Director
For
Immediate Release
(505) 827-0314
or
(505) 231-0475
The New Mexico
Environment Department prevailed today
in a major case
before the Water Quality Control Commission that
reaffirms the
state's ability to enforce the Water Quality Act to
protect the state's
precious groundwater resources.
The ruling
establishes that groundwater beneath Freeport McMoRan Copper
and Gold's Tyrone
Mine in Grant County is protected. The decision will
require the company
to continue to take steps to protect groundwater and
clean up pollution
beneath the mine property. The case reaffirms the
state's authority
to protect groundwater at any site it regulates,
including mines,
dairies and national laboratories.
"The
commission upheld the department's longstanding position that in
an
arid state like New
Mexico - where we derive 90 percent of our drinking
water from
groundwater - all aquifers must be protected," said New
Mexico Environment
Department Secretary Ron Curry. "The commission
re-established the
state's right to protect water quality and all
groundwater now and
for future generations. This precedent setting
decision is
important not only for the Tyrone mine site but for the
regulation of
groundwater quality in Grant County and the rest of the
state as
well."
The decision will
require Freeport, formerly Phelps Dodge Mining Corp.,
to continue to
follow requirements the department established to protect
groundwater at the
mine site.
The case hinged on
Freeport's argument that groundwater within the
Tyrone mine site -
consisting of several thousand acres -- was exempt
from state
groundwater protections as long as the company did not cause
groundwater off
site to become contaminated. The result of this argument
would have been to
create a groundwater "sacrifice zone" at the mine
site. The
department has long maintained that groundwater underneath the
site should be
protected now and into the future.
The commission
rejected Freeport's contention that this groundwater is
not protected.
The case began in
2002 and has been ongoing ever since. The company,
after a lengthy
hearing, challenged the New Mexico Environment
Department's
hearing officer's initial decision in the case. The hearing
officer affirmed
the state's right to issue a permit with conditions for
the protection of
groundwater quality and require the company to follow
provisions of the
Water Quality Act. The case was subsequently heard
before the
commission, which upheld the department's authority. Freeport
then appealed the
case to the state Court of Appeals, which largely
affirmed the
commission's decision but remanded the case to the
commission on the
limited issue of groundwater protection. Today's
decision was the
result of that remand.
I commend the
commission on its hard work, technical expertise and
thorough review and
deliberation that required hundreds of hours of
work,"
Secretary Curry said.
The New Mexico
Legislature in 1967 passed the Water Quality Act, which
provides protection
for all groundwater in the state.
For more
information, call Marissa Stone at (505) 827-0314.
_____________________________________________________________
New
Mexico Environment Department reaches agreement with
Homestake regarding water supply
HMC to provide city water to a dozen or more homes in Bluewater Valley
January 12,
2009, Santa Fe, NM.
In
a signed Memorandum Of Agreement (MOA) between the NMED and HMC, certain
residents will be connected to the Milan water supply. Additional
information is available
by downloading the following documents.
Download the
NMED MOA by clicking here - PDF
File
Download the
response to the MOA by the bvda by clicking here - DOC
file
|